A few imho (minor) gripes with the Excel 20
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
A few imho (minor) gripes with the Excel 20
Since buying the Excel 20 a week ago, I did a few cooks on it and I am beginning to love it, anyway much more than my (meanwhile sold) WSM. Excel(lent) smoker and grill.
I only have 2 minor gripes and I was wondering if I am the only one.
1) It is very difficult to lift the waterpan from the stacker because it is so big. I hardly can get my hands between the pan and the stacker. Because I don't use water until now (clay saucer instead) and I sometimes want to switch between (indirect) smoking and (direct) grilling, I would like to be able to remove the waterpan when it is still hot and of course with oven mitts, but that is very difficult.
2) Tonight I wanted to use my newly bought Maverick ET-73 with the Excel 20 with one stacker. The Maverick works like a charm, but having only one eyelet for the probe, I had to pass the food probe between stacker and lid or the top vent. It would be nice if there were 2 eyelets per stacker.
I only have 2 minor gripes and I was wondering if I am the only one.
1) It is very difficult to lift the waterpan from the stacker because it is so big. I hardly can get my hands between the pan and the stacker. Because I don't use water until now (clay saucer instead) and I sometimes want to switch between (indirect) smoking and (direct) grilling, I would like to be able to remove the waterpan when it is still hot and of course with oven mitts, but that is very difficult.
2) Tonight I wanted to use my newly bought Maverick ET-73 with the Excel 20 with one stacker. The Maverick works like a charm, but having only one eyelet for the probe, I had to pass the food probe between stacker and lid or the top vent. It would be nice if there were 2 eyelets per stacker.
Ton- Charcoal Starter
- Number of posts : 33
Location : Netherlands
Registration date : 2009-07-29
Re: A few imho (minor) gripes with the Excel 20
Why don't you just thread both probes through one eyelet, one at a time, or is the hole to small to carry both cables?
This is a mod i did to my Frontier.
https://s288.photobucket.com/albums/ll163/novicebucket/?action=view¤t=DSCF0936.jpg
This is a mod i did to my Frontier.
https://s288.photobucket.com/albums/ll163/novicebucket/?action=view¤t=DSCF0936.jpg
Novice- Burger Flipper
- Number of posts : 166
Location : Birmingham England
Registration date : 2008-05-03
Re: A few imho (minor) gripes with the Excel 20
The eyelet is not too small for both cables, but once that one cable runs through it, it is too small to get the other probe through it.
Of course I could drill out the eyelet, but I cannot judge how thick the metal is. Is there enough metal to remove without removing the eyelet itself ? (I hope that you know what I mean).
Of course I could drill out the eyelet, but I cannot judge how thick the metal is. Is there enough metal to remove without removing the eyelet itself ? (I hope that you know what I mean).
Ton- Charcoal Starter
- Number of posts : 33
Location : Netherlands
Registration date : 2009-07-29
Similar topics
» Which Smoker?
» Excel 20 in the uk
» new lid for excel 20
» Excel 20's are in the US, but...
» Need Excel 20 help
» Excel 20 in the uk
» new lid for excel 20
» Excel 20's are in the US, but...
» Need Excel 20 help
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|